SOC

Surgery on Children Journal aims to publish issues related to Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Neurosurgery, Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Pediatric Vascular Surgery, Pediatric Gynecology and Obstetrics, Pediatric Ear Nose Throat, Ophthalmology, Pediatric Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pediatric Urology, Pediatric Surgical Intensive Care Clinic, and other clinical surgery fields on children of the highest scientific and clinical value at an international level and accepts articles on these topics.

EndNote Style
Index
Review
Pediatric supernumerary testis: preservation, orchiopexy, or orchiectomy?
Polyorchidism is a rare congenital anomaly in which more than two testes are present. In children, its importance lies less in rarity than in the surgical dilemma created when an additional gonad is identified during examination, imaging, or surgery for cryptorchidism, hernia, torsion, or an inguinoscrotal mass. To review the contemporary evidence on pediatric supernumerary testes and to provide a practical framework for deciding when a viable gonad should be preserved, fixed, or removed. A focused narrative review was undertaken using key historical publications, systematic reviews, contemporary pediatric pooled analyses, and selected case reports relevant to embryology, classification, imaging, diagnostic pitfalls, torsion, malignancy, reproductive potential, and surgical management. Current evidence favors preservation of a viable, morphologically reassuring supernumerary testis when surveillance is feasible. Orchiopexy is appropriate when a viable gonad is malpositioned or has a demonstrable fixation abnormality. Orchiectomy remains appropriate for irreversible ischemia, severe atrophy or involution, grossly abnormal tissue, or genuine oncological suspicion. The absolute malignant risk of a normal pediatric supernumerary testis remains uncertain and should not be inferred directly from historical case-report series. Management should be individualized according to viability, morphology, position, vascular and ductal anatomy, associated cryptorchidism, torsion risk, oncological concern, and feasibility of follow-up. The presence of a supernumerary testis alone is not an indication for orchiectomy.
Author Contributions

Conceptualization: NB; Design: NB, FF; Supervision: NB; Literature Assessment: NB, FF; Analysis and/or Interpretation: NB, FF, AT, MEB; Literature Review: NB, FF, AT, MEB; Writing: NB, FF, AT, MEB; Critical Review: NB, FF, AT, MEB; Final Approval: All Authors; Accountability: All Authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Financial Disclosure

No financial support was received for the preparation or publication of this article.


1. Bergholz R, Wenke K. Polyorchidism: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2009; 182(5):2422-2427. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.063
2. Balawender K, Wawrzyniak A, Kobos J, et al. Polyorchidism: an up-to-date systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):649. doi:10.3390/jcm12020649
3. Fang H, Wang X, Yu Y, et al. Beyond triorchidism: diagnostic pitfalls and an evidence-driven algorithm for pediatric supernumerary testes. Eur J Med Res. 2026;31:333. doi:10.1186/s40001-026-03938-4
4. Baltogiannis N, Mavridis G, Keramidas D. Triochidism associated with cryptorchidism. Pediatr Med Chir. 2005;27(1-2):104-105.
5. Baltogiannis N, Papandreou E, Faviou E, Christopoulos-Geroulanos G. Triorchidism: conservative or surgical management? Review Series Urology. 2007;(3-4):17-19.
6. Baltogiannis N, Fili F, Faviou E. Polyorchidism. Atypical presentations of supernumerary testicle can lead to misdiagnosis. BAOJ Pediat. 2017; 3:043.
7. Nocks BN. Polyorchidism with normal spermatogenesis and equal sized testes: a theory of embryological development. J Urol. 1978;120(5):638-640. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57308-5
8. Singer BR, Donaldson JG, Jackson DS. Polyorchidism: functional classification and management strategy. Urology. 1992;39(4):384-388. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(92)90220-Q
9. Bergholz R, Koch B, Spieker T, Lohse K. Polyorchidism: a case report and classification. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(11):1933-1935. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.07.031
10. Chung TJ, Yao WJ. Sonographic features of polyorchidism. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30(2):106-108. doi:10.1002/jcu.10031
11. Yalçınkaya S, Şahin C, Şahin AF. Polyorchidism: sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(5):E84-86. doi:10.5489/cuaj.10077
12. Danrad R, Ashker L, Smith W. Polyorchidism: imaging may denote reproductive potential of accessory testicle. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(6): 492-494. doi:10.1007/s00247-003-1120-5
13. Ferro F, Iacobelli B. Polyorchidism and torsion. A lesson from 2 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(10):1662-1664. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.06.029
14. Khedis M, Nohra J, Dierickx L, et al. Polyorchidism: presentation of 2 cases, review of the literature and a new management strategy. Urol Int. 2008;80(1):98-101. doi:10.1159/000111738
15. Mathur P, Prabhu K, Khamesra HL. Polyorchidism revisited. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002;18(5-6):449-450. doi:10.1007/s00383-002-0765-8
16. Artul S, Habib G. Polyorchidism: two case reports and a review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:464. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-8-464
17. Savas M, Yeni E, Ciftci H, Cece H, Topal U, Utangac MM. Polyorchidism: a three-case report and review of the literature. Andrologia. 2010;42(1):57-61. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.00957.x
18. Zahirian Moghadam T, Mohseni Rad H, Zandian H, Hosseinkhani A. Five testicles in the genital area of a thirteen-month-old baby: a case report. BMC Urol. 2020;20:128. doi:10.1186/s12894-020-00681-8
Volume 3, Issue 4, 2026
Page : 155-160
_Footer