SOC

Surgery on Children Journal aims to publish issues related to Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Neurosurgery, Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Pediatric Vascular Surgery, Pediatric Gynecology and Obstetrics, Pediatric Ear Nose Throat, Ophthalmology, Pediatric Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pediatric Urology, Pediatric Surgical Intensive Care Clinic, and other clinical surgery fields on children of the highest scientific and clinical value at an international level and accepts articles on these topics.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Evaluation of the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) as a prognostic and surgical decision-making marker in necrotising enterocolitis
Aims: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a complex gastrointestinal disorder characterized by intestinal wall necrosis and a high mortality rate. The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) is a novel biomarker that reflects systemic inflammation and immune response, calculated from blood counts of neutrophils, platelets, monocytes, and lymphocytes. The present study evaluates the utility of PIV, an accessible and cost-effective parameter, in patients with NEC and investigates its potential to differentiate between those who recover with medical management and those who require surgical intervention. Materials and
Methods: Data from 793 patients admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) between May 2018 and November 2022 were analyzed in a retrospective single-centre cohort study. The study included 40 NEC patients (Stages 1, 2, and 3) and 753 control subjects (218 preterm, 535 term). The PIV [(Neutrophils × Platelets × Monocytes) / Lymphocytes] was calculated using complete blood count results obtained on postnatal days 0 and 1, at the NEC diagnosis time point (with postnatal-age-aligned control measurements) and, for NEC cases, at discharge/death. Because PIV values were markedly right-skewed and the Shapiro–Wilk test rejected normality in every group at every time point (all p<0.001), unadjusted between-group comparisons were performed with Kruskal–Wallis tests and Dunn–Bonferroni post-hoc tests; repeated measurements were analysed with a linear mixed model on log-transformed PIV for the time × group interaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for gestational age and birth weight were performed to assess whether PIV predicts the need for surgery.
Results: PIV values showed significant differences between the study groups on postnatal day 0 (p=0.001) and day 1 (p<0.001). In contrast, PIV values were comparable between the groups at the time of NEC diagnosis (p=0.358) and did not differ significantly according to NEC stage at discharge or death (p=0.875).Contrary to the pattern suggested by group means, median PIV in the surgical NEC group was not the highest at any time point, and Dunn–Bonferroni post-hoc testing identified only one significant pair (Bell I vs term controls on day 1, p=0.005). ROC analysis showed no evidence of discriminative ability of PIV for the need for surgery at any evaluated time point (AUC 0.42–0.58; all 95% CIs included 0.50). PIV was not an independent predictor of surgery in multivariable logistic regression (day 1: OR 1.0004, 95% CI 0.9998–1.0009, p=0.164). The unadjusted NEC–control differences disappeared after adjustment for gestational age and birth weight (day 0: p=0.858; day 1: p=0.339), and the time × group interaction was not significant (p=0.656).
Conclusion: In this retrospective single-centre cohort, PIV did not discriminate NEC cases requiring surgery from those managed medically, and the apparent NEC–control differences were largely explained by gestational age and birth weight. These findings do not support the use of PIV as a stand-alone marker for surgical decision-making in NEC. Given the small surgical subgroup (n=13), the study is hypothesis-generating and the results require confirmation in larger, prospective, multicentre cohorts.
Ethical Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for Non-interventional Clinical Researches at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences (Date: 17.05.2023, Decision No: 2023/119).

Informed Consent

This retrospective study used pre-existing anonymized patient data. No additional intervention was performed, and there was no direct patient contact. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee, and the requirement for written informed consent was waived by the ethics committee.

Author Contributions

Concept: IY, IS; Design: IY, IS; Control: IY, IS; Resources: IY, SEUB, GBB, IS; Materials: IY, SEUB, GBB, IS; Data Collection and/or Processing: IY, SEUB; Analysis and/or Interpretation: GBB, IS; Literature Review: GBB, IS; Critical Review: GBB, IS; Final Approval: IY, GBB, IS; Accountability: IY, IS.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the conduct or publication of this research.


1. Neu J, Walker WA. Necrotizing enterocolitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3): 255-264. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1005408
2. Niño DF, Sodhi CP, Hackam DJ. Necrotizing enterocolitis: new insights into pathogenesis and mechanisms. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(10):590-600. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.119
3. Hackam DJ, Sodhi CP. Toll-like receptor-mediated intestinal inflammatory imbalance in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;6(2):229-238.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.04.001
4. Pammi M, Cope J, Tarr PI, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis in preterm infants preceding necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):31. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0248-8
5. Hackam DJ, Good M, Sodhi CP. Mechanisms of gut barrier failure in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis: Toll-like receptors throw the switch. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2013;22(2):76-82. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2013.01.003
6. Yazji I, Sodhi CP, Lee EK, et al. Endothelial TLR4 activation impairs intestinal microcirculatory perfusion in necrotizing enterocolitis via eNOS-NO-nitrite signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(23): 9451-9456. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219997110
7. Robinson JR, Rellinger EJ, Hatch LD, et al. Surgical necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(1):70-79. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.020
8. Rich BS, Dolgin SE. Necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Rev. 2017;38(12): 552-559. doi:10.1542/pir.2017-0002
9. Wang D, Zhang F, Pan J, Yuan T, Jin X. Influencing factors for surgical treatment in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2024;24:512. doi:10.1186/s12887-024-04978-7
10. Gephart SM, Gordon PV, Penn AH, et al. Changing the paradigm of defining, detecting, and diagnosing NEC: perspectives on Bell’s stages and biomarkers for NEC. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27(1):3-10. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.002
11. Fucà G, Guarini V, Antoniotti C, et al. The pan-immune-inflammation value is a new prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a pooled analysis of the Valentino and TRIBE first-line trials. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(3):403-409. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0894-7
12. Ligorio F, Fucà G, Zattarin E, et al. The pan-immune-inflammation value predicts the survival of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer treated with first-line taxane-trastuzumab-pertuzumab. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(8):1964. doi:10.3390/cancers13081964
13. Melville JM, Moss TJM. The immune consequences of preterm birth. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:79. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00079
14. Cho SX, Berger PJ, Nold-Petry CA, Nold MF. The immunological landscape in necrotising enterocolitis. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2016;18:e12. doi:10.1017/erm.2016.13
15. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg. 1978;187(1):1-7. doi:10.1097/00000658-197801000-00001
16. Alsaied A, Islam N, Thalib L. Global incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:344. doi:10.1186/s12887-020-02231-5
17. Battersby C, Santhalingam T, Costeloe K, Modi N. Incidence of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis in high-income countries: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(2):F182-F189. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2017-313880
18. Jones IH, Hall NJ. Contemporary outcomes for infants with necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review. J Pediatr. 2020;220:86-92.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.11.011
19. Han SM, Hong CR, Knell J, et al. Trends in incidence and outcomes of necrotizing enterocolitis over the last 12 years: a multicenter cohort analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;55(6):998-1001. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.046
20. Egan CE, Sodhi CP, Good M, et al. Toll-like receptor 4-mediated lymphocyte influx induces neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(2):495-508. doi:10.1172/JCI83356
21. Feng W, Hou J, Xiang C, et al. Correlation of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:1044449. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.1044449
22. Maheshwari A. Immunologic and hematological abnormalities in necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. 2015;42(3):567-585. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2015.04.014
23. Henry E, Christensen RD. Reference intervals in neonatal hematology. Clin Perinatol. 2015;42(3):483-497. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2015.04.005
24. Chen Y, Gong L, Gu P, et al. Pan-immune-inflammation and its dynamics: predictors of survival and immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving immunotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):944. doi:10.1186/s12885-023-11366-4
25. Steyerberg E, Hackmann T, van Calster B, van Smeden M, Wynants L. Recent criteria and simple rules agreed often on required sample size for developed clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2026;199: 112461. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112461
Volume 3, Issue 4, 2026
Page : 126-132
_Footer