SOC
Surgery on Children

Surgery on Children Journal aims to publish issues related to Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Neurosurgery, Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Pediatric Vascular Surgery, Pediatric Gynecology and Obstetrics, Pediatric Ear Nose Throat, Ophthalmology, Pediatric Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pediatric Urology, Pediatric Surgical Intensive Care Clinic, and other clinical surgery fields on children of the highest scientific and clinical value at an international level and accepts articles on these topics.

eISSN: 3023-7289
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
Brace yourself: a critical look at YouTube videos on pectus carinatum Is YouTube Trustworthy for Health Info?
Abstract
Aims: YouTube is a widely accessed platform for health-related information, but the reliability and quality of its content remain questionable. This study aimed to evaluate the informational and overall quality of YouTube videos related to pectus carinatum using standardized scoring systems.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in March 2025 using the keywords “pectus carinatum” and “pectus carinatum children”. Videos were filtered based on relevance, language (English), and content inclusion criteria. A total of 34 videos were analyzed. Two pediatric surgery specialists independently assessed the videos using the DISCERN and Global Quality Scale (GQS). Statistical analyses were performed to explore correlations between video characteristics and quality scores, as well as differences based on the source of upload.
Results: The mean DISCERN and GQS scores were 53.7 ± 16.46 and 3.47 ± 0.94, respectively. Approximately 41% of videos were classified as high quality based on DISCERN, while 47% were considered high quality based on GQS. Videos uploaded by professional organizations had significantly higher scores than those by individual users (p < 0.05). There was no strong correlation between view counts or likes and the quality scores. Upload time was not significantly associated with video quality.
Conclusion: The quality and informational value of YouTube videos related to pectus carinatum vary significantly, with content from professional sources generally offering higher reliability. This underscores the importance of healthcare professionals and academic institutions taking an active role in producing scientifically accurate, unbiased, and up-to-date content on digital platforms.

Keywords : Pectus carinatum, Youtube, misinformation

Download Article


1. Global Media Insight 2025. Youtube users statistics. Accessed March 2025. https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/youtube-users-statistics/
2. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Social media platforms: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2021;59(2):68-72. doi:10.5114/reum.2021.102707
3. Tanner JP, Takats C, Lathan HS, et al. Approaches to research ethics in health research on YouTube: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43060. doi:10.2196/43060
4. Szmuda T, Syed MT, Singh A, et al. YouTube as a source of patient information for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): a content-quality and audience engagement analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30(5):e2132. doi:10.1002/rmv.2132
5. Janssen N, Coorens NA, Franssen A, et al. Pectus excavatum and carinatum: a narrative review of epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, and classification. J Thorac Dis. 2024;16(2):1687-701. doi:10.21037/jtd-23-957
6. Shang Z, Hong C, Duan X, Li X, Si Y. Orthotic bracing or minimally invasive surgery? a summary of 767 pectus carinatum cases for 9 years. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6942329. doi:10.1155/2021/6942329
7. Kutluk A, Gürsoy S. Göğüs duvarı hastalıkları ve cerrahisi. TÜSAD Eğitim Kitapları Serisi; 2020.
8. Sahin E, Seyyar M. Assessing the scientific quality and reliability of YouTube videos about chemotherapy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(45):e35916. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000035916
9. Charnock D. The DISCERN handbook: quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. Radcliffe Medical; 1998.
10. Mukhamediyarov M, Nurmashev B, Bekaryssova D. Analysis of the quality and credibility of health-related content on YouTube: cross-sectional study. Central Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics. 2024;5(4):269-278.
11. Jacob CC, Makary MS. Quality and impact of youtube for patient education on prostatic artery embolization. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; 50(7):3347-3352. doi:10.1007/s00261-024-04790-y
12. Kara M, Ozduran E, Mercan Kara M, Hanci V, Erkin Y. Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17215. doi:10.7717/peerj.17215
13. Mohamed F, Shoufan A. Users’ experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):86. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-17585-5
14. Aktar Ugurlu G, Ugurlu BN. Evaluating the quality and reliability of youtube videos on tympanostomy tubes: a comprehensive analysis for patients and parents. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):776. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21963-6
15. Osman W, Mohamed F, Elhassan M, et al. Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review. BMC Med Education. 2022;22(1):382. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z
16. Polat YH, Cankurtaran RE. Assessment of reliability and validity of celiac disease-related YouTube videos: content analysis. JMIR Infodemiology. 2025;5:e58615. doi:10.2196/58615
17. Khater AN, Mostafa AM, Ibrahim AM, Awad AM, Wafa TA. Is YouTube a source of misinformation for pediatric surgeons? Post pandemic cross-sectional study. J Pediatr Surg Open. 2023;4:100083. doi:10.1016/j.yjpso.2023.100083
18. Assadi R, Gasparyan AY. Editing, publishing and aggregating video articles: do we need a scholarly approach? J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(9): 1211-1212. doi:10.3346/jkms.2015.30.9.1211
19. Jana PK, Patoda S, Roy PK, et al. Information on recent monkeypox outbreak: systematic search and content analysis of YouTube videos. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023;1(1):40-51. doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig. 2023.01.005
20. Zhaksylyk A, Yessirkepov M, Akyol A, Kocyigit BF. YouTube as a source of information on public health ethics. J Korean Med Sci. 2024;39(7): e61. doi:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e61
21. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS. Exploring the role of YouTube in supplementing medical education and patient care. J Scientific Society. 2023;50(3):282-286. doi:10.4103/jss.jss_84_22
22. Akakpo MG, Akakpo PK. Recognizing the role of YouTube in medical education. Discover Education. 2024;3(1):73. doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00131-9
Article available in :
Volume 2, Issue 4, 2025
Page : 126-130
https://doi.org/10.51271/SOC-0050
Article Information
Received : 09 Tem 2025
Accepted : 14 Ağu 2025
Published : 01 Eki 2025
Corresponding Author :

Berkay Tekkanat: Department of Pediatric Urology, Eskişehir City Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkiye

[email protected]
Citation : Tekkanat B, Kuas N. Brace yourself: a critical look at YouTube videos on pectus carinatum–is YouTube trustworthy for health info? Surg Child. 2025;2(4):126-130.

Read: 273
Download : 131
Cited: 0
_Footer