1. Yu X, Nassar N, Mastroiacovo P, et al. Hypospadias prevalence and trends in international birth defect surveillance systems, 1980-2010. Eur Urol. 2019;76(4):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.027
2. Wood D, Wilcox D. Hypospadias: lessons learned. An overview of incidence, epidemiology, surgery, research, complications, and outcomes. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35(1):61-66. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00563-7
3. Wood DN, Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. Standing the test of time: the long-term results of urethroplasty. World J Urol. 2006;24(3):250-254. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0057-3
4. Wilcox D, Snodgrass W. Long-term outcome following hypospadias repair. World J Urol. 2006;24(3):240-243. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0059-1
5. Kundra P, Yuvaraj K, Agrawal K, Krishnappa S, Kumar LT. Surgical outcome in children undergoing hypospadias repair under caudal epidural vs penile block: surgical outcome hypospadias repair. Pediatr Anesth. 2012; 22(7):707-712. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03702.x
6. Goel P, Jain S, Bajpai M, Khanna P, Jain V, Yadav DK. Does caudal analgesia increase the rates of urethrocutaneous fistula formation after hypospadias repair? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Urol. 2019;35(3):222. doi:10.4103/iju.IJU_252_18
7. Zhu C, Wei R, Tong Y, Liu J, Song Z, Zhang S. Analgesic efficacy and impact of caudal block on surgical complications of hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44(2):259-267. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000022
8. Koul A, Shukla D, Aggrawal SK, Sethi N. Incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula following distal hypospadias repair with and without caudal epidural block: a randomized pilot study. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(1):58.e1-58.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.11.006
9. Aydın A, Sönmez MG, Büyükşerbetçi M, Salar R. The use of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty to repair distal hypospadias in a peripheral state hospital. J Urol Surg. 2019;6(3):231-237. doi:10.4274/jus.galenos.2019.2388
10. Bhat A, Mandal A. Acute postoperative complications of hypospadias repair. Indian J Urol. 2008;24(2):241. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.40622
11. Saavedra-Belaunde JA, Soto-Aviles O, Jorge J, Escudero K, Vazquez-Cruz M, Perez-Brayfield M. Can regional anesthesia have an effect on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing distal hypospadia surgery? J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(1):45.e1-45.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.09.011.
12. Zaidi RH, Casanova NF, Haydar B, Voepel-Lewis T, Wan JH. Urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair: regional anesthesia and other factors. Bosenberg A, editor. Pediatr Anesth. 2015;25(11):1144-1150. doi:10.1111/pan.12719
13. Fischer KM, Van Batavia J, Hyacinthe N, et al. Caudal anesthesia is not associated with post-operative complications following distal hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(4):374-379. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.03.019
14. Kim MH, Im YJ, Kil HK, Han SW, Joe YE, Lee JH. Impact of caudal block on postoperative complications in children undergoing tubularised incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: a retrospective cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(7):773-778. doi:10.1111/anae.13463
15. Saavedra-Belaunde JA, Soto-Aviles O, Jorge J, Escudero K, Vazquez-Cruz M, Perez-Brayfield M. Can regional anesthesia have an effect on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing distal hypospadia surgery? J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(1):45.e1-45.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.09.011
16. Hu JC, Belon C, Ravula NR, Durbin-Johnson B, Kurzrock EA. Impact of caudal block on revision rates after hypospadias repair: multi-institution review. J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(3):292.e1-292.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.02.004
17. Winberg H, Arnbjörnsson E, Anderberg M, Stenström P. Postoperative outcomes in distal hypospadias: a meta-analysis of the Mathieu and tubularized incised plate repair methods for development of urethrocutaneous fistula and urethral stricture. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019; 35(11):1301-1308. doi:10.1007/s00383-019-04523-z
18. Karaca O, Pinar HU, Gokmen Z, Dogan R. Ultrasound-guided versus conventional caudal block in children: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2019;29(6):533-538. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676980
19. Nanjundaswamy Nethra H, Nagappa, Saraswathi; Shridhara, Raghavendra Biligiri; Kalappa, Sandya. A comparative study of ultrasound-guided caudal block versus anatomical landmark-based caudal block in pediatric surgical cases. The Indian Anaesthetists Forum 21(1):p10-15, Jan-Jun 2020. doi:10.4103/TheIAForum.TheIAForum_73_19
20. Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Ahiskalioglu EO, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus conventional injection for caudal block in children: a prospective randomized clinical study. J Clin Anesth. 2018;44:91-96. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.011
21. Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufre E, Orliaguet G, Courr eges P. Association des Anesthesistes Reanimateurs Pediatriques d’Expression Francaise (ADARPEF). Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(12):1061e9