1. Schneuer FJ, Holland AJA, Pereira G, Bower C, Nassar N. Prevalence, repairs and complications of hypospadias: an Australian population-based study. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(11):1038-1043.
2. Springer A, van den Heijkant M, Baumann S. Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(3):152.e1-152.e7.
3. Snodgrass W, Macedo A, Hoebeke P, Mouriquand PDE. Hypospadias dilemmas: a round table. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7(2):145-157.
4. Chaudhary G, Yhoshu E, Chauhan U, et al. Anatomical study of hypospadias penis using magnetic resonance imaging in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(1):57.e1-57.e7.
5. Orkiszewski M. A standardized classification of hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8(4):410-414.
6. Hadidi, AT. Hypospadias surgery: an illustrated textbook second edition. 2nd ed. Springer Netherlands; 2022.
7. Giannantoni A. Hypospadias classification and repair: the riddle of the sphinx. Eur Urol. 2011;60(6):1190-1191.
8. Arlen AM, Kirsch AJ, Leong T, Broecker BH, Smith EA, Elmore JM. Further analysis of the glans-urethral meatus-shaft (GMS) hypospadias score: correlation with postoperative complications. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(2):71.e1-71.e5.
9. Merriman LS, Arlen AM, Broecker BH, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ, Elmore JM. The GMS hypospadias score: assessment of inter-observer reliability and correlation with post-operative complications. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(6): 707-712.
10. Sheng X, Xu D, Wu Y, Yu Y, Chen J, Qi J. The risk factors of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery in the youth population. BMC Urol. 2018; 18(1):64.
11. Wu Y, Wang J, Zhao T, et al. Complications following primary repair of non-proximal hypospadias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:579364.
12. Bush NC, Holzer M, Zhang S, Snodgrass W. Age does not impact risk for urethroplasty complications after tubularized incised plate repair of hypospadias in prepubertal boys. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(3):252-256.
13. Prat D, Natasha A, Polak A, et al. Surgical outcome of different types of primary hypospadias repair during three decades in a single center. Urology. 2012;79(6):1350-1354.
14. Hisamatsu E, Sugita Y, Haruna A, Shibata R, Yoshino K. The learning curve in proximal hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(3):330.e1-330.e6.
15. Spinoit AF, Poelaert F, Groen LA, Van Laecke E, Hoebeke P. Hypospadias repair at a tertiary care center: long-term followup is mandatory to determine the real complication rate. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2276-2281.
16. Bush NC, Snodgrass W. Pre-incision urethral plate width does not impact short-term tubularized incised plate urethroplasty outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(6):625.e1-625.e6.
17. Sarhan O, Saad M, Helmy T, Hafez A. Effect of suturing technique and urethral plate characteristics on complication rate following hypospadias repair: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2009;182(2):682-686.
18. Sozubir S, Snodgrass W. A new algorithm for primary hypospadias repair based on tip urethroplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(8):1157-1161.
19. Abbas TO, Braga LH, Spinoit AF, Salle JP. Urethral plate quality assessment and its impact on hypospadias repair outcomes: a systematic review and quality assessment. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(3):316-325.
20. Holland AJA, Smith GHH. Effect of the depth and width of the urethral plate on tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol. 2000;164(2):489-491.
21. Bush NC, Villanueva C, Snodgrass W. Glans size is an independent risk factor for urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(6):355.e1-355.e5.
22. Faasse MA, Johnson EK, Bowen DK, et al. Is glans penis width a risk factor for complications after hypospadias repair? J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):202.e1-202.e5.
23. Sennert M, Wirmer J, Hadidi AT. Preoperative glans & penile dimensions in different hypospadias grades. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(1):47-53.
24. Huang J, Rayfield L, Broecker B, et al. High GMS score hypospadias: outcomes after one- and two-stage operations. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(3): 291.e1-291.e4.
25. Shoukry A, Abbas A, Abdelwahab M, et al. Glans-urethral meatus-shaft score and penile parameters as preoperative assessment tools for hypospadias surgery outcome. Afr J Urol. 2021;27(1):102.
26. Abbas TO. An objective hypospadias classification system. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(4):481.e1-481.e8.
27. Castagnetti M, El-Ghoneimi A. Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: systematic 20-year review. J Urol. 2010;184(4): 1469-1475.
28. Long CJ, Canning DA. Proximal hypospadias: we aren’t always keeping our promises. F1000Res. 2016;5:2379.